DOC.
61
DISCUSSION OF DOCUMENT 60 587
Published in
Physikalische
Zeitschrift
10 (1909):
825-826.
Discussion
following
Einstein
1909c
(Doc.
60),
held
on
21
September
1909,
pub-
lished
10
November
1909.
[1]
For
Planck's criticisms
see
Planck
1910;
see
also Planck
to
Einstein,
6
July
1907. Ein-
stein
gave
an answer
in his
"Antwort
auf
Planks
Manuskript,"
ca. January
1910.
[2]
See
Einstein
1909c
(Doc. 60),
p.
821,
and
Stark
1909a,
p.
583.
[3]
Taylor 1909, however,
reports
the usual in-
terference
effects
even
with radiation
of
very
low
intensity.
[4]
Lorentz had earlier raised the
problem
of
interference
of
low-intensity
radiation
(Hendrik
Lorentz to
Einstein,
6
May 1909),
to which
Ein-
stein
responded
with
comments
similar to those
here
(Einstein to
Hendrik
Lorentz,
23
May
1909).
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)


DOC.
61
DISCUSSION OF DOCUMENT 60 587
Published in
Physikalische
Zeitschrift
10 (1909):
825-826.
Discussion
following
Einstein
1909c
(Doc.
60),
held
on
21
September
1909,
pub-
lished
10
November
1909.
[1]
For
Planck's criticisms
see
Planck
1910;
see
also Planck
to
Einstein,
6
July
1907. Ein-
stein
gave
an answer
in his
"Antwort
auf
Planks
Manuskript,"
ca. January
1910.
[2]
See
Einstein
1909c
(Doc. 60),
p.
821,
and
Stark
1909a,
p.
583.
[3]
Taylor 1909, however,
reports
the usual in-
terference
effects
even
with radiation
of
very
low
intensity.
[4]
Lorentz had earlier raised the
problem
of
interference
of
low-intensity
radiation
(Hendrik
Lorentz to
Einstein,
6
May 1909),
to which
Ein-
stein
responded
with
comments
similar to those
here
(Einstein to
Hendrik
Lorentz,
23
May
1909).

Help

loading