ELECTRODYNAMICS OF
MOVING
MEDIA 505
At the time
of
their
collaboration,
Laub
was
Assistent to Wilhelm Wien,
Professor of
Physics
at
the
University
of
Würzburg.[11]
Laub's
interest in the
theory
of
relativity
had
already
led
to two
articles
applying
the
theory
to
optical
problems.[12]
He
started to
corre-
spond
with
Einstein,[13]
and
on
2
February
1908
suggested
that he
come
to Bern to work
with him. On
1
March Laub wrote that he
planned
to
arrive
at
the
beginning
of
April.[14]
The datelines
of
their
joint
papers[15]
suggest
that both
were
written
during a
little
over a
month
of
collaboration,
after which Laub returned
to
Würzburg.[16]
Laub showed the
manuscripts
to Wien who, in
addition to
being
Laub's
superior, was a
co-editor of
the
Annalen;
he
added
several references at
Wien's
suggestion.[17]
At the time
they
wrote their
papers,
Einstein and Laub
evidently
were
not at
ease
with
the four-dimensional
approach. They justified publication
of
a more elementary
derivation
of Minkowski's
field
equations
in
their first
paper on
the
grounds
of
the
"rather
great
[mathematical]
demands"
("ziemlich
große
Anforderungen")
placed on
readers
by
Min-
kowski's
work.[18]
The second and final section
of
the
paper applies
Minkowski's
equa-
tions to the Wilson
effect,
the
occurrence
of
equal
and
opposite charges on
the two surfaces
of
an uncharged
dielectric
cylindrical
shell when it
is
rotated
in
a magnetic
field.[19]
They
showed,
for
a
dielectric with
significant magnetic permeability,
that
Minkowski's
equa-
tions
predict a
different
charge density
than do
Lorentz's.
The Minkowski
prediction
was
confirmed
several
years
afterward.[20]
The
discovery
of
several incorrect factors
of
1/c
in their
equations
led Einstein and Laub
to
publish a
correction
to the
paper.[21]
Einstein wrote
consolingly
to
Laub that
"well
patched
is
always
still better than full
of holes"
("gut
geflickt
ist immer noch
besser
als
verlöchert").[22]
A second correction
was soon
needed.
Max Laue criticized
Einstein
and Laub's
discus–
[11]
Laub studied at
Göttingen
from 1902
to
1905,
and then
went to
Würzburg
to
work with
Wien. He submitted
a
doctoral dissertation
on
secondary
cathode
ray
emission in
1906,
but had
already developed a particular
interest in the the-
ory
of
relativity.
See
Pyenson
1976 for
a
discus-
sion
of Laub's
career
that
emphasizes
his work
with Einstein.
[12]
See
Laub
1907, 1908.
For
Einstein's
com-
ment
on
the first
paper, see
Einstein
1907j (Doc.
47),
p.
414. For
Laue's
comments,
see
Max
Laue
to Einstein,
4
September
1907.
[13]
The first known letter in their
correspon-
dence
is
Jakob Laub to Einstein, 27
January
1908.
[14]
In
a
letter to Mileva Einstein-Maric
of
17
April
1908,
Einstein stated that he
was working
with Laub.
[15]
Einstein
and
Laub 1908a
(Doc. 51) is
dated 29
April,
and Einstein
and
Laub 1908b
(Doc.
52) is
dated
7
May.
[16]
Jakob Laub
to Einstein, 18
May
1908, is
written from
Würzburg.
[17]
See
Jakob Laub to Einstein
18
May,
19
May,
and 30
May
1908 for
reports
of
comments
by
Wien
on
the
two
papers.
[18]
Einstein and
Laub 1908a
(Doc. 51),
p.
532.
[19]
See Wilson 1904.
[20]
See Wilson
and
Wilson 1913. Soon after
the Einstein-Laub
paper was
written,
Wien
sug-
gested
the
possibility
of
testing
the
prediction
with
an
iron solution
(see
Jakob Laub
to
Ein-
stein, 19 May 1908),
but
nothing seems
to
have
come
of this
suggestion.
[21]
See
Einstein
and
Laub 1908c
(Doc. 53).
[22]
Einstein to Jakob Laub, mid-October 1908
(excerpt
from the auction
catalogue
of
Gerd
Ro-
sen, Berlin,
April
1961,
p.
3,
item
no.
2365a).
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)


ELECTRODYNAMICS OF
MOVING
MEDIA 505
At the time
of
their
collaboration,
Laub
was
Assistent to Wilhelm Wien,
Professor of
Physics
at
the
University
of
Würzburg.[11]
Laub's
interest in the
theory
of
relativity
had
already
led
to two
articles
applying
the
theory
to
optical
problems.[12]
He
started to
corre-
spond
with
Einstein,[13]
and
on
2
February
1908
suggested
that he
come
to Bern to work
with him. On
1
March Laub wrote that he
planned
to
arrive
at
the
beginning
of
April.[14]
The datelines
of
their
joint
papers[15]
suggest
that both
were
written
during a
little
over a
month
of
collaboration,
after which Laub returned
to
Würzburg.[16]
Laub showed the
manuscripts
to Wien who, in
addition to
being
Laub's
superior, was a
co-editor of
the
Annalen;
he
added
several references at
Wien's
suggestion.[17]
At the time
they
wrote their
papers,
Einstein and Laub
evidently
were
not at
ease
with
the four-dimensional
approach. They justified publication
of
a more elementary
derivation
of Minkowski's
field
equations
in
their first
paper on
the
grounds
of
the
"rather
great
[mathematical]
demands"
("ziemlich
große
Anforderungen")
placed on
readers
by
Min-
kowski's
work.[18]
The second and final section
of
the
paper applies
Minkowski's
equa-
tions to the Wilson
effect,
the
occurrence
of
equal
and
opposite charges on
the two surfaces
of
an uncharged
dielectric
cylindrical
shell when it
is
rotated
in
a magnetic
field.[19]
They
showed,
for
a
dielectric with
significant magnetic permeability,
that
Minkowski's
equa-
tions
predict a
different
charge density
than do
Lorentz's.
The Minkowski
prediction
was
confirmed
several
years
afterward.[20]
The
discovery
of
several incorrect factors
of
1/c
in their
equations
led Einstein and Laub
to
publish a
correction
to the
paper.[21]
Einstein wrote
consolingly
to
Laub that
"well
patched
is
always
still better than full
of holes"
("gut
geflickt
ist immer noch
besser
als
verlöchert").[22]
A second correction
was soon
needed.
Max Laue criticized
Einstein
and Laub's
discus–
[11]
Laub studied at
Göttingen
from 1902
to
1905,
and then
went to
Würzburg
to
work with
Wien. He submitted
a
doctoral dissertation
on
secondary
cathode
ray
emission in
1906,
but had
already developed a particular
interest in the the-
ory
of
relativity.
See
Pyenson
1976 for
a
discus-
sion
of Laub's
career
that
emphasizes
his work
with Einstein.
[12]
See
Laub
1907, 1908.
For
Einstein's
com-
ment
on
the first
paper, see
Einstein
1907j (Doc.
47),
p.
414. For
Laue's
comments,
see
Max
Laue
to Einstein,
4
September
1907.
[13]
The first known letter in their
correspon-
dence
is
Jakob Laub to Einstein, 27
January
1908.
[14]
In
a
letter to Mileva Einstein-Maric
of
17
April
1908,
Einstein stated that he
was working
with Laub.
[15]
Einstein
and
Laub 1908a
(Doc. 51) is
dated 29
April,
and Einstein
and
Laub 1908b
(Doc.
52) is
dated
7
May.
[16]
Jakob Laub
to Einstein, 18
May
1908, is
written from
Würzburg.
[17]
See
Jakob Laub to Einstein
18
May,
19
May,
and 30
May
1908 for
reports
of
comments
by
Wien
on
the
two
papers.
[18]
Einstein and
Laub 1908a
(Doc. 51),
p.
532.
[19]
See Wilson 1904.
[20]
See Wilson
and
Wilson 1913. Soon after
the Einstein-Laub
paper was
written,
Wien
sug-
gested
the
possibility
of
testing
the
prediction
with
an
iron solution
(see
Jakob Laub
to
Ein-
stein, 19 May 1908),
but
nothing seems
to
have
come
of this
suggestion.
[21]
See
Einstein
and
Laub 1908c
(Doc. 53).
[22]
Einstein to Jakob Laub, mid-October 1908
(excerpt
from the auction
catalogue
of
Gerd
Ro-
sen, Berlin,
April
1961,
p.
3,
item
no.
2365a).

Help

loading