DOC.
141
NOVEMBER
1915 145
141. To Wander and Geertruida de Haas
[Berlin,
before
15
November
1915][1]
My
dear de
Haases,
I
was
very pleased
with
your exquisite
little
letter,
from which
one can
im-
mediately
feel
how
happily
and
contentedly you
are
living
in
your
little
nest.
I
definitely
believe
that
you
have done
the
right
thing
with
your
decision.
23
hours
are
a
lot,
though.
But
teaching
is
very
amusing,
especially
when
facing
sturdy, unspoiled
country
children with
healthy
nerves.[2] I
believe
that
I
also
could accustom
myself
with relish to such
a
position
even
now.[3]
As far
as
I
can see,
not
much
can
be done
in the
laboratory
with
gravita-
tion. The
negative
result
on
the
independence
of
gravitational
acceleration from
matter is probably
adequately
secure.
It
would
suffice for
me,
even
without
any
experiments
with
radioactive substances whatsoever.[4]
In the
end,
because
we
can
observe
their
transformations,
these substances will
not exhibit
any
unusual
inertial
behavior.
I
am very
eager
to
see
your paper
on
the
effect.[5] I
have also conducted
ex-
periments
in which
I
reversed the remanent
magnetism by
means
of
a
condenser’s
discharge
current.[6]
But the
thing
has
not worked
until
now
because, despite
the
short duration
of
the
field
(10-3"), an
intense
vibration
of
the
rod
ensued,
oblit-
erating
the
effect.[7]
This
will naturally
be avoided with
your
method.
I hardly
believe
that
your 10% discrepancy
with
the
theory
is
real. If
it
were so,
however,
it would be
very
important. As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
still do not know
what
Maxwell
has done
on
this
subject.[8]
At
any
rate
it
is evident
here
as
well
what
a
good
nose
this
man
had!
Barnett’s comment
actually
gave
me
little
confidence.[9]
Working
analogously
with metal electrons
is
very
difficult.
But
you
are
at
the
best
location for this
enterprise,
of
course.
I
congratulate
you
particularly
on
your
lathe
and
on
its
attached
mechanic;[10]
the
thing
has
style.
Cordial
greetings
to
you, your
wife,
and
the
children and
a
happy
New
Year,
yours,
A.
Einstein.
[10]Recipient’s
note: “who
could work
only
with
the bad lathe and
not
with the
good
one.”
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)


DOC.
141
NOVEMBER
1915 145
141. To Wander and Geertruida de Haas
[Berlin,
before
15
November
1915][1]
My
dear de
Haases,
I
was
very pleased
with
your exquisite
little
letter,
from which
one can
im-
mediately
feel
how
happily
and
contentedly you
are
living
in
your
little
nest.
I
definitely
believe
that
you
have done
the
right
thing
with
your
decision.
23
hours
are
a
lot,
though.
But
teaching
is
very
amusing,
especially
when
facing
sturdy, unspoiled
country
children with
healthy
nerves.[2] I
believe
that
I
also
could accustom
myself
with relish to such
a
position
even
now.[3]
As far
as
I
can see,
not
much
can
be done
in the
laboratory
with
gravita-
tion. The
negative
result
on
the
independence
of
gravitational
acceleration from
matter is probably
adequately
secure.
It
would
suffice for
me,
even
without
any
experiments
with
radioactive substances whatsoever.[4]
In the
end,
because
we
can
observe
their
transformations,
these substances will
not exhibit
any
unusual
inertial
behavior.
I
am very
eager
to
see
your paper
on
the
effect.[5] I
have also conducted
ex-
periments
in which
I
reversed the remanent
magnetism by
means
of
a
condenser’s
discharge
current.[6]
But the
thing
has
not worked
until
now
because, despite
the
short duration
of
the
field
(10-3"), an
intense
vibration
of
the
rod
ensued,
oblit-
erating
the
effect.[7]
This
will naturally
be avoided with
your
method.
I hardly
believe
that
your 10% discrepancy
with
the
theory
is
real. If
it
were so,
however,
it would be
very
important. As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
still do not know
what
Maxwell
has done
on
this
subject.[8]
At
any
rate
it
is evident
here
as
well
what
a
good
nose
this
man
had!
Barnett’s comment
actually
gave
me
little
confidence.[9]
Working
analogously
with metal electrons
is
very
difficult.
But
you
are
at
the
best
location for this
enterprise,
of
course.
I
congratulate
you
particularly
on
your
lathe
and
on
its
attached
mechanic;[10]
the
thing
has
style.
Cordial
greetings
to
you, your
wife,
and
the
children and
a
happy
New
Year,
yours,
A.
Einstein.
[10]Recipient’s
note: “who
could work
only
with
the bad lathe and
not
with the
good
one.”

Help

loading