594
DOCS.
566,
567
JUNE
1918
has
to set
xa
=
n/2,
c
=
2,
R
=
Kp0/3_
in formula
(35)
there
in order
to have de
2
V
3
Sitter’s
ds2.[12]
Formula
(35)
relates,
of
course,
to
the
interior
of
the
sphere
at rest
considered
by
Schwarzschild of
gravitating liquid
of
constant
density.
Formula
(30)
is
thus
applicable,
which
yields p
=
-p0,
hence
a
steady
pull.[13]
Obliging regards
from
yours
most
truly,
Klein.
P.S.
I
think
I
can
set
your
letter
of
9 June[14] straight
now.
The
ÄB's
are
strictly
equal
to
zero
for
a
#
4,
the
corresp.
Axa’s
are
arbitrarily
small
against
Ax4.[15]
567. To
Felix
Klein
[Berlin,
20
June
1918]
Esteemed
Colleague,
You
are
entirely right.
De
Sitter’s world
is,
in and of
itself,
free of
singulari-
ties
and its
space-time points
are
all
equivalent.[1]
A
singularity
comes
about
only
through
the
substitution
providing
the
transition to the static form of
the
line el-
ement. This
substitution
changes
the
analysis-situs
relations. Two
hypersurfaces
t
=
t1
and
t
= t2
intersect
each
other
in
the
original represention,
whereas they do not
intersect
each
other
in
the
static
one.[2]
This
is
related
to
the fact
that, for
the
physi-
cal
interpretation,
masses are
necessary
in
the static
conception
but
not
in
the
former
one.[3]
My
critical remark about
de Sitter’s solution needs
correction;
a
singularity-free
solution for
the
gravitation
equations
without
matter
does in
fact
exist.[4]
However,
under
no
condition could
this
world
come
into
consideration
as
a
physical possibility.
For in
this
world,
time t cannot be defined in such
a
way
that the
three-dimensional slices t
=
const. do not intersect
one
another and
so
that
these slices
are
equal
to
one
another
(metrically).[5]
With
sincere
thanks
for
your
fine
and
illuminating
letter,
yours truly,
A.
Einstein.
Recipients
note
on
the
verso:
“Did
Weyl
appear? Appointment regarding
the
building
plans
of
the Math. Inst.”
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)


594
DOCS.
566,
567
JUNE
1918
has
to set
xa
=
n/2,
c
=
2,
R
=
Kp0/3_
in formula
(35)
there
in order
to have de
2
V
3
Sitter’s
ds2.[12]
Formula
(35)
relates,
of
course,
to
the
interior
of
the
sphere
at rest
considered
by
Schwarzschild of
gravitating liquid
of
constant
density.
Formula
(30)
is
thus
applicable,
which
yields p
=
-p0,
hence
a
steady
pull.[13]
Obliging regards
from
yours
most
truly,
Klein.
P.S.
I
think
I
can
set
your
letter
of
9 June[14] straight
now.
The
ÄB's
are
strictly
equal
to
zero
for
a
#
4,
the
corresp.
Axa’s
are
arbitrarily
small
against
Ax4.[15]
567. To
Felix
Klein
[Berlin,
20
June
1918]
Esteemed
Colleague,
You
are
entirely right.
De
Sitter’s world
is,
in and of
itself,
free of
singulari-
ties
and its
space-time points
are
all
equivalent.[1]
A
singularity
comes
about
only
through
the
substitution
providing
the
transition to the static form of
the
line el-
ement. This
substitution
changes
the
analysis-situs
relations. Two
hypersurfaces
t
=
t1
and
t
= t2
intersect
each
other
in
the
original represention,
whereas they do not
intersect
each
other
in
the
static
one.[2]
This
is
related
to
the fact
that, for
the
physi-
cal
interpretation,
masses are
necessary
in
the static
conception
but
not
in
the
former
one.[3]
My
critical remark about
de Sitter’s solution needs
correction;
a
singularity-free
solution for
the
gravitation
equations
without
matter
does in
fact
exist.[4]
However,
under
no
condition could
this
world
come
into
consideration
as
a
physical possibility.
For in
this
world,
time t cannot be defined in such
a
way
that the
three-dimensional slices t
=
const. do not intersect
one
another and
so
that
these slices
are
equal
to
one
another
(metrically).[5]
With
sincere
thanks
for
your
fine
and
illuminating
letter,
yours truly,
A.
Einstein.
Recipients
note
on
the
verso:
“Did
Weyl
appear? Appointment regarding
the
building
plans
of
the Math. Inst.”

Help

loading